Carbon credit assessment for Mangrove conservation: A detailed study of Futian Mangrove reserve in Shenzhen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mangroves are significant coastal blue carbon ecosystems that play an essential role in mitigating climate change. However, due to the lack of reasonable benefit quantification methods and active market regulation mechanisms, the carbon credit generated by mangroves is difficult to enter the carbon market. Drawing on extensive references to relevant domestic and international guidelines, standards, and methodologies, this study developed a carbon credit measurement method for mangrove protection carbon sink projects that comprehensively considers carbon benefits, biodiversity benefits, and community benefits. The allometric equation of mangrove species with high recognition in the academic community was used to estimate the variation of carbon storage of each carbon pool from 2017 to 2020. A novel technique based on land use change prognostication was introduced to determine the baseline scenario of project. Carbon benefits for the study area during the first monitoring period (2010-2020) were conservatively estimated. Special investigations and monitoring were conducted in China’s only national nature reserve located in the city’s hinterland, based on the years of biodiversity surveys and high-resolution remote sensing images. The results indicate that the carbon density in the Futian National Mangrove Nature Reserve in Shenzhen was 416.362±5.579 tCO 2 e /ha in 2020. The conservation project not only helps mitigate climate change but also contributes to biodiversity conservation and community development. The average annual carbon benefit from the mangrove conservation sequestration project in the initial monitoring period was 3874.544 tCO 2 e .a -1 . The development of carbon credit accounting methods for mangrove protection will facilitate the utilization of carbon market mechanisms to achieve effective resource allocation, expand financing channels for mangrove protection initiatives, and further enhance the conservation of mangrove ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".