Iron isotope fractionation between solid and liquid metal in the Fe-P±Ni system: Experimental constraints and implications for meteorites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Iron meteorites record a range of Fe isotope compositions that hold valuable information regarding the evolution of their parent bodies. Interpreting this isotopic variability, however, requires experimental constraints on the equilibrium isotope fractionation between phases. It is thought that the cores of many iron meteorite parent bodies experienced fractional crystallization, during which crystallization of solid iron-nickel occurs from an increasingly non-metal-rich liquid alloy. Phosphorus is one component of this alloy, and this study provides the first constraints on Fe-isotope fractionation between solid and liquid alloys in the Fe-Ni-P system. Experiments comprising Fe and P show a clear enrichment in the light isotopes of Fe in the liquid phase, which increases with the amount of phosphorus. Nickel-bearing samples are offset from the trend defined by Ni-free experiments, which is accounted for by the change in the solid alloy phase from a body-centered cubic to face-centered cubic structure upon the addition of Ni. The increasing light isotope enrichment of the liquid with increasing P content suggests interstitial solution of P, which is known to lengthen Fe-Fe bonds in Fe-P liquids (Waseda and Shiraishi 1977). Results suggest a negligible effect of P on Fe isotope fractionation during planetesimal core crystallization. Iron isotopes may, however, prove useful for identifying the petrogenesis of schreibersite in pallasites and iron meteorites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".