A disordered linker in the Polycomb protein Polyhomeotic tunes phase separation and oligomerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates are increasingly recognized as key regulators of chromatin organization, yet how their formation and properties arise from protein sequences remains incompletely understood. Cross-species comparisons can reveal both conserved functions and significant evolutionary differences. Here, we integrate in vitro reconstitution, molecular dynamics simulations, and cell-based assays to examine how Drosophila and human variants of Polyhomeotic (Ph)-a subunit of the PRC1 chromatin regulatory complex-drive condensate formation through their sterile alpha motif (SAM) oligomerization domains. We identify divergent interactions between SAM and the disordered linker connecting it to the rest of Ph. These interactions enhance oligomerization and modulate both the formation and properties of reconstituted condensates. Oligomerization influences condensate dynamics but minimally impacts condensate formation. Linker-SAM interactions also affect condensate formation in Drosophila and human cells and growth in Drosophila imaginal discs. Our findings show how evolutionary changes in disordered linkers can fine-tune condensate properties, providing insights into sequence-function relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".