MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410818433 · doi:10.1103/jfzb-rfl4

First measurement of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1320</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> polarized photoproduction cross section

2025· article· lv· W4410818433 on OpenAlexafffund
C. S. Akondi, M. Albrecht, M. J. Amaryan, S. Arrigo, V. Arroyave, A. Asaturyan, A. Austregesilo, Z. Baldwin, F. Barbosa, J. Barlow, E. Barriga, R. Barsotti, D. S. Barton, V. Baturin, В. В. Бердников, T. Black, W. Boeglin, M. Boër, W. J. Briscoe, T. Britton, S. Cao, E. Chudakov, G. Chung, P. L. Cole, O. Cortes, V. Credé, M. M. Dalton, D. Darulis, A. Deur, S. Dobbs, A. Dolgolenko, M. Dugger, R. Dzhygadlo, D. Ebersole, M. Edo, H. Egiyan, T. Erbora, P. Eugenio, A. Fabrizi, C. Fanelli, S. S. Fang, J. Fitches, A. M. Foda, S. Furletov, L. Gan, H. Gao, A. Gardner, A. Gasparian, D. I. Glazier, C. Gleason, V. Goryachev, B. Grube, J. Guo, Li Guo, J. Hernandez, K. Hernandez, Nathaniel Hoffman, D. Hornidge, G. Hou, P. Hurck, A. Hurley, W. Imoehl, D. G. Ireland, M. M. Ito, I. Jaeglé, N. S. Jarvis, T. Jeske, M. Q. Jing, R. T. Jones, V. Kakoyan, G. Kalicy, V. Khachatryan, C. Kourkoumelis, A. LaDuke, I. Larin, David Lawrence, D. I. Lersch, H. Li, B. Liu, K. Livingston, G. J. Lolos, L. Lorenti, Valery E. Lyubovitskij, R. Ma, A. Mahmood, H. Marukyan, V. Matveev, M. McCaughan, M. McCracken, C. A. Meyer, R. Miskimen, R. E. Mitchell, K. Mizutani, Paula M. Moran, V. Neelamana, L. Ng, E. Nissen, S. Orešić, A. I. Ostrovidov, Z. Papandreou, C. Paudel, R. Pedroni, L. Pentchev, K. J. Peters, E. Prather, L. Puthiya Veetil, S. Rakshit, J. Reinhold, A. Remington, B. G. Ritchie, J. Ritman, G. Rodriguez, D. Romanov, K. Saldana, C. Salgado, S. Schadmand, A. M. Schertz, K. Scheuer, A. Schick, A. Schmidt, R. A. Schumacher, J. Schwiening, M. Scott, N. Septian, P. Sharp, X. Y. Shen, M. R. Shepherd, J. Sikes, E. S. Smith, D. I. Sober, A. Somov, S. Somov, J. R. Stevens, I. I. Strakovsky, B. Sumner, K. Suresh, В. В. Тарасов, S. Taylor, A. Teymurazyan, A. Thiel, T. Viducic, T. Whitlatch, N. Wickramaarachchi, Y. Wunderlich, Boxiang Yu, J. Zarling, Zhenyu Zhang, Xiang Zhou, B. Zihlmann

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2025
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaMount Allison UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
FundersGSI Helmholtzzentrum für SchwerionenforschungComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaForschungszentrum JülichNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measure for the first time the differential photoproduction cross section dσ /dt of the a2 (1320) meson at an average photon beam energy of 8.5 GeV, using data with an integrated luminosity of 104 pb−1 collected by the GlueX experiment. We fully reconstruct the γ p → ηπ0 p reaction and perform a partial-wave analysis in the a2 (1320) mass region with amplitudes that incorporate the linear polarization of the beam. This allows us to separate for the first time the contributions of natural- and unnatural-parity exchanges. These measurements provide novel information about the photoproduction mechanism, which is critical for the search for spin-exotic. states

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207