MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410818749 · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102610

Multi-junction laser power converters exceeding 50% efficiency in the short wavelength infrared

2025· article· en· W4410818749 on OpenAlexafffund
Gavin P. Forcade, D. Paige Wilson, Meghan N. Beattie, Carmine Pellegrino, Henning Helmers, R. F. Hunter, Oliver Höhn, David Lackner, Louis-Philippe St-Arnaud, T.N.D. Tibbits, Daniel Poitras, Christopher E. Valdivia, Yuri Grinberg, Alexandre W. Walker, Jacob J. Krich, Karin Hinzer

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Physical Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsConvertersInfraredWavelengthPower (physics)LaserOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceOpticsElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photonic or laser power converters are crucial components in power-by-light systems. However, their use in long-distance applications has been hindered by low efficiencies and output voltages within the optical fiber transmission window of 1.3–1.6 μm laser wavelengths. Here, we improve and simplify the design and characterization processes for photonic power converters, exceeding 50% efficiency under 1.446 μm laser light. We develop a calibrated model predicting efficiency gains with increasing bandgap, reaching up to 57% efficiency at a 1.3-μm wavelength. As a first demonstration, we produce a high-efficiency device designed by the model: a four-junction InGaAsP photonic power converter with a conversion efficiency of 53.6% ± 1.3% and an output voltage above 2 V under 15.2 W/cm 2 of 1.446 μm laser light. These advances open new, practical pathways for integrating photonic power converters into telecommunication systems and unlock the potential to further optimize their design with machine learning algorithms trained with our predictive model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Reports Physical ScienceSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207