MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410819317 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.111.054320

Collinear laser spectroscopy on neutron-rich actinium isotopes

2025· article· en· W4410819317 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruohong Li, A. Teigelhöfer, Jiguang Li, Jacek Bieroń, András Gácsbaranyi, J. D. Johnson, Per Jönsson, Victoria L. Karner, Mingxuan Ma, Martin Radulov, Mathias Roman, Monika Stachura, J. Lassen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of WindsorSimon Fraser UniversitySaint Mary's UniversityTRIUMF
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIsotopeSpectroscopyNeutronRadiochemistryNuclear physicsPhysicsChemistryAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-resolution collinear laser spectroscopy of neutron-rich actinium has been performed at TRIUMF's isotope separator and accelerator facility ISAC. By probing the $7{s}^{2}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}^{1}S_{0}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}6d7p\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}^{1}P_{1}$ ionic transition, the hyperfine structures and optical isotope shifts in $^{225,226,228,229}\mathrm{Ac}^{+}$ have been measured. This allows precise determinations of the changes in mean-square charge radii, magnetic dipole moments, and electric quadrupole moments of these actinium isotopes. The improved precision of charge radii and magnetic moments clears the ambiguity in the odd-even staggering from previous studies. The electric quadrupole moments of $^{225,226,228,229}\mathrm{Ac}$ are determined for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207