MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exploring the efficacy and mechanism of action of combined pan-Raf and MEK inhibition in halting the growth of non-V600 BRAF mutated tumors.

2025· article· en· W4410822612 on OpenAlexaff
Islam E. Elkholi, Marco Biondini, Emmanuelle Rousselle, Sarah M. Maritan, Jennifer Maxwell, Matthew G. Annis, Peter M. Siegel, Anna Spreafico, David W. Cescon, April A. N. Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkMcGill UniversityUniversity of TorontoJewish General Hospital
FundersConquer Cancer Foundation
KeywordsMedicineMechanism of actionCancer researchMechanism (biology)TrametinibPharmacologyMAPK/ERK pathwayPhosphorylationIn vitroCell biologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3117 Background: Class 2 & 3 non-V600 BRAF mutations mediate RAF dimerization to hyperactivate the MAPK signaling pathway. Encorafenib (Enco; BRAF monomer inhibitor) + Binimetinib (Bini; MEK inhibitor) elicit responses in <15% of patients with non-V600E BRAF mutations (NCT03839342). We hypothesized that Belvarafenib (Belva), a novel pan-RAF dimer inhibitor, is more potent than Enco in inhibiting the growth of Class 2 & 3 non-V600 BRAF mutated tumors. Methods: We performed in vitro colonogenic assays to compare the growth inhibitory effect of 5 independent doses of individual inhibitors (Bini, Belva, or Enco) in parallel to 25 different combinations of either Belva+Bini or Enco+Bini in 6 non-V600 BRAF mutated melanoma (WM3629, HMV-II), colorectal (CRC) (NCI-H508, HT55), and lung (NCI-H1666, NCI-H2087) cancer cells. Low nanomolar doses (10-1000 nM) were used to investigate the synergistic potential of either combination using the SynergyFinder tool. Belva+Bini (15 mg/kg each) and Enco+Bini (75 mg/kg + 15 mg/kg) combinations were assessed in 4 non-V600 BRAF (3 Class 3, 1 Class 2) metastatic CRC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. The inhibitory effect of Belva and Enco on MAPK activity in the outlined 6 cell lines was assessed by immunoblotting. Transcriptomic (RNA-Seq) analysis was performed on PDXs. Results: Belva+Bini was 2-6-fold more effective than Enco+Bini in inhibiting the growth of the 6 cell lines. Belva+Bini achieved overall higher synergy scores in the 6 cell lines and was synergistic in 5/6 cell lines (synergy score > 10) vs. Enco+Bini that was synergistic in 1/6 cell lines. In the 6 cell lines, Belva inhibited MAPK activity more robustly than Enco (assessed by pERK levels). In vivo , Belva+Bini was significantly more effective than vehicle or Enco+Bini in halting the growth of 3 out of 4 PDXs. Both Belva+Bini and Enco+Bini significantly inhibited MAPK activity vs. vehicle (as assessed by the transcriptional MAPK Pathway Activity Score). However, there was no statistically significant difference between both combinations. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed that Belva+Bini significantly downregulated genes mediating the interconnected mTORC1 pathway activity and cholesterol metabolism dynamics in the 3 PDXs where Belva+Bini had anti-growth effect. Specifically, among the top downregulated genes by Belva+Bini was PCSK9 , a druggable key regulator of cholesterol metabolism. Conclusions: These results from 10 preclinical models, tested so far, put forward combined Pan-Raf and MEK inhibition as a potential effective treatment choice for patients with non-V600 BRAF mutated tumors to be investigated in clinical trials. In parallel, they unravel novel insights into the mechanism of action of this therapeutic approach and in return the druggable vulnerabilities of the non-V600 BRAF mutated tumors, a notion we are further investigating in the outlined models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207