How ‘long term’ is long term enough? Bridging neo- and paleo-ecological timescales

A challenge in assessing the impacts of ongoing human-driven environmental and climate changes is the limited long-term data from monitoring programs and field studies, which rarely span more than a few decades (Nevalainen et al. 2020, Dodds et al. 2012). In line with common usage of ‘long term’ in ecology, Dodds et al. (2012) fined a “long-term ecological data set as data that are measured systematically through time using standardized methods that allow for the elucidation of ecological system responses (e.g., linear, lag, threshold, regime shift) to drivers, disturbances (e.g., presses or pulses), recovery from disturbances, and relevant interactions for a given hypothesis.” However, while experimental, field, and monitoring data are essential to develop insights into mechanisms and possibly reveal emerging trends, these time series provide limited insights into long-term – i.e., decadal–centennial–millennial – dynamics that enable defining reference conditions and possible underlying trajectories, which are required for identifying ongoing super-imposed changes. Since national monitoring programs in Sweden began in the early-1980’s, lake-water organic carbon (LW-TOC; Fig. 1) has been increasing in many lakes (de Wit et al. 2016), which affects light penetration and freshwater ecology (Horppila et al. 2024). Increasing LW-TOC has been attributed to decreasing S deposition, increasing temperature and wetness (de Wit et al. 2016, Monteith et al. 2007), and increasing forest cover (Finstad et al. 2016). Since precipitation monitoring began in 1978–1980, S deposition has decreased and precipitation pH increased by ~0.75–1 pH units. Temperatures have been increasing over the timeframe available from the longest continuous time series: in Lund, southern Sweden, June temperatures have increased 2°C since 1859, and in Mora, central Sweden, show a similar ~2°C increase since 1941. Finally, the Swedish National Forest Inventory indicates forests in southwestern Sweden have increased 2–4 fold and in central Sweden by ~60% since 1923. Because these long-term data for S deposition, climate, and forest growth have been changing at the same time as LW-TOC increases (Fig. 1), disentangling the relative importance of these factors. Furthermore, none of these time series provide information on reference conditions or the full timeframe of current trajectories. Using monitoring data from Sweden and specifically LW-TOC, we demonstrate the importance of integrating contemporary instrumental data with sedimentary records; that is, bridging instrumental and paleolimnological timescales (Fig. 2). This research has entailed developing calibrations between instrumental data and sediment proxies (VNIRS-inferred LW-TOC; (Meyer-Jacob et al. 2015, Meyer-Jacob et al. 2017, Rosén 2005), demonstrating the proxy signal is preserved in sediments, and assessing the trends from monitoring in relation to longer-term patterns (Meyer-Jacob et al. 2015, Meyer-Jacob et al. 2019, Meyer-Jacob et al. 2017, Myrstener et al. 2021). Our research has shown the importance of acidification/recovery, climate changes, and/or land-use changes has varied within Sweden and in other northern areas. Focusing on data from Sweden (Fig. 3), LW-TOC increased with post-glacial landscape development and thereafter remained high and stable through most of the Holocene (Meyer-Jacob et al. 2015, Myrstener et al. 2021). In northern Finland LW-TOC was also associated climate (). However, in Sweden, centuries-long traditional use led to declining LW-TOC, which began c. 700 CE in southwestern Sweden and c. 1400 in central Sweden – declining by ~50% by the 1800’s. The association with human impacts is evidenced by declining arboreal pollen, increasing pollen of plants favored by human disturbance, and occurrence of pollen from cultivated plants. In southwestern Sweden, where 20 th -century impacts of acidification were greatest, LW-TOC decreased even further. The current levels of LW-TOC in these lakes are still far below the ‘natural’ levels preceding human impacts. In Canada, where historical land uses did not have the same impact as in Sweden, it has been possible to tease apart the influence of acidification and climate on recent increases in LW-TOC (Meyer-Jacob et al. 2019). During the 20 th century acidification in the highest S deposition areas has been the most important driver of LW-TOC decreases – similar to the 20 th -century decline in southwestern Sweden. Thus, increasing LW-TOC is mainly a response to acidification recovery. In contrast, outside of high S deposition areas LW-TOC decreased less during the mid-20 th century due to S deposition, the increasing LW-TOC has in some cases exceeded pre-acidification values, indicating a climate contribution to the trend. Taken together, these centennial–millennial long records of past environmental changes have been able to identify important long-term patterns and levels in LW-TOC, and to disentangle the importance of key processes identified through field and experimental studies. The paleolimnological studies indicate there are regionally different drivers underlying the observed increases in LW-TOC in northern lakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.