MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410828452 · doi:10.21037/tp-2025-33

Predicting death and survival without major morbidity for extremely preterm infants using information on hospital admission: a multicenter cohort study

2025· article· en· W4410828452 on OpenAlexaff
Xincheng Cao, Shujuan Li, Xinyue Gu, Huiyao Chen, Chuanzhong Yang, Qian Miao, Xiuying Tian, Falin Xu, Zuming Yang, Yang Wang, Jinzhen Guo, Shoo K. Lee, Siyuan Jiang, Yun Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatricsCohort studyCohortMulticenter studyIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineInternal medicineRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Accurate prediction of outcomes for extremely preterm infants (EPIs) during the early stage is important to assist clinicians and parents in making decisions. This study aimed to develop and validate models for predicting mortality and survival without major morbidity for EPIs using information available on neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) admission. Methods: weeks' gestation were included in China. Two predictive models were generated separately to predict mortality and survival without major morbidity at discharge. Potential predictors were identified if they had a well-established association with neonatal outcomes in literatures and could be easily obtained on NICU admission, including gestational age, birth weight, sex, inborn, antenatal steroids, 5-min Apgar score, and invasive ventilation on admission. Logistic regression was employed to develop the models. Model performance was assessed via area under the curve (AUC). Results: Among 2,438 EPIs in the development cohort, the mortality rate was 17.7% (431/2,438) and the rate of survival without major morbidity was 52.5% (1,281/2,438). Among the 5,045 infants in the validation cohort, 9.2% (463/5,045) died, and 59.1% (2,981/5,045) survived without major morbidity. Gestational age, birth weight, invasive ventilation on NICU admission, antenatal steroids use, and 5-min Apgar score were selected as predictors in the mortality model, yielding the AUC of 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.79]. For the survival without major morbidity model, predictors were gestational age, birth weight, invasive ventilation on NICU admission, sex, and 5-min Apgar score, and the AUC was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.74). The validation cohort resulted in AUCs of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.78) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.68-0.71) for the mortality and survival without major morbidity models, respectively. Conclusions: Using commonly available predictors on NICU admission including gestational age, birth weight, invasive ventilation on NICU admission, antenatal steroids use, sex, and 5-min Apgar score, we successfully developed and validated two distinct models with acceptable performance, predicting mortality and survival without major morbidity for EPIs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational PediatricsSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207