MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410832708 · doi:10.26034/vd.fpeq.2008.053

Difficultés d’insertion professionnelle en enseignement : le rôle des conceptions de l’éducation d’étudiants étrangers inscrits dans un programme de formation des maîtres en Ontario

2008· article· fr· W4410832708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFormation et pratiques d’enseignement en question · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les étudiants étrangers inscrits au programme de formation à l’enseignement de l’Université d’Ottawa méconnaissent le système éducatif canadien. Pour certains d’entre eux, cette situation entraîne des difficultés d’adaptation ayant parfois pour conséquence une évaluation médiocre et même, l’échec du stage. Cette recherche visait la compréhension des conceptions de l’éducation de ces étudiants, notamment en ce qui a trait au rôle et aux savoirs de l’enseignant, de même qu’au rôle de l’élève dans ses apprentissages. La recherche a tenté de dégager des pistes de réflexion permettant de faciliter le cheminement en stage des étudiants étrangers et ainsi de favoriser leurs chances d’insertion professionnelle dans l’enseignement. Une approche qualitative a été privilégiée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.011
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it