Formation professionnalisante et culture d’enseignement : l’exemple de la formation des enseignants du secondaire à l’Université de Sherbrooke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution présente le dispositif de formation initiale des enseignants de l’Université de Sherbrooke. L’analyse de données relatives à l’importance que les étudiants de fin de cycle accordent aux composantes transversales, disciplinaires, didactiques, pratiques et réflexives du dispositif de formation montre que les futurs enseignants continuent à faire preuve d’une représentation de la formation plus pratique que professionnelle et plus disciplinaire que pédagogique, cela malgré les efforts consentis pour construire auprès d’eux un nouveau modèle de professionnalité. Ces résultats mettent en résonance la question de la réception des modèles de professionnalité par les futurs enseignants et celle des tensions entre « savoirs à enseigner » et « savoir pour enseigner ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".