MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410837929 · doi:10.12962/j2716179x.v20i1.3032

Rencana Pusat Pelayanan Kawasan Perkotaan Ambarawa, Kabupaten Semarang

2025· article· id· W4410837929 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Penataan Ruang · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wilayah dengan berbagai aktivitas seperti ekonomi dan sosial memerlukan sarana dan prasarana untuk mendukung keberlangsungan aktivitas tersebut. Tingginya aktivitas dan banyaknya sarana dapat membentuk pusat kegiatan yang mempercepat perkembangan wilayah. Pertumbuhan penduduk juga mempengaruhi perkembangan wilayah. Berdasarkan Perda Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 RTRW Kabupaten Semarang Tahun 2023- 2043, Kecamatan Ambarawa ditetapkan sebagai pusat kegiatan lokal yang melayani permukiman, perdagangan, jasa, serta menjadi pusat pengembangan pariwisata, pertanian, danperikanan untuk kecamatan sekitarnya. Hal ini berdampak pada peningkatan jumlah penduduk dan kebutuhan sarana perkotaan. Ambarawa juga termasuk dalam Kawasan Strategis Kedungsepur yang mendukung pertumbuhan ekonomi di sekitar Kota Semarang (Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No 60Tahun 2022). Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi pusat dan fungsi pelayanan kota di Kecamatan Ambarawa dengan melihat ketersediaan sarana di 10 desa/kelurahan. Metode yang digunakan meliputi telaah dokumen dan observasi, mencakup status desa kota, kependudukan, fasilitas perkotaan, penggunaan lahan, dan sistem jaringan jalan. Analisis yang dilakukan mencakup identifikasi kependudukan, penggunaan lahan, origindestination, kepadatan bangunan, kepadatan sarana strategis, kerapatan jaringan jalan (Kernel Density), dan analisis Global Human Settlement Layer. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi lima SWP dengan fungsi yang berbeda, meliputi perdagangan, jasa, fasilitas umum, sosial, pariwisata, militer, pertanian, dan perumahan dengan berbagai kepadatan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Penataan RuangSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207