MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410840208 · doi:10.1061/9780784486153.038

Iqaluit’s New Deep-Sea Port in the Canadian Arctic

2025· article· en· W4410840208 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher Meisl, Justin McDonell, Andrew Quinn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsGovernment of NunavutFraser Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPort (circuit theory)ArcticThe arcticOceanographyComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iqaluit, located in Nunavut in the Canadian Arctic, is the site of a recently constructed full-serviced deep-sea port dedicated to the annual resupply of cargo, including dry cargo and bulk fuel. The port was built by the Government of Nunavut. Iqaluit, the capital city of the Nunavut territory in northern Canada, has a population of 8,000 and receives more cargo than any other Arctic community in Canada, typically receiving an average of 12 dry cargo ships and 7 fuel tankers per year during the navigable season of early July till the end of October. Other vessel calls to Iqaluit include the Canadian Coast Guard, fishing trawlers, research vessels, cruise ships, and naval ships. With a vertical tidal range approaching 12 m between high and low astronomical tides during the spring tides, dry cargo was historically lightered ashore by flat bottom barge to a beach accessible for only short daily windows, fuel was pumped ashore with floating hoses, and crew/passenger ship changes were tendered ashore in small boats. The new port includes a deep-sea wharf, sealift ramp, laydown yard, fuel pipeline extension and manifold, and other ancillary components. The newly completed facility allows for 24 h operations, no tidal restrictions, and increased laydown space resulting in significant reductions in the unloading times of vessels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous Studies and Ecology→French-language works237,207→