Consequences of climate-related poleward shifts in cod spawning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With climate change, many species alter their distribution according to local climate velocities. For marine fish, suitable areas for spawning in a warming climate may be less favorable for the resulting offspring, e.g., the sensitive larval and juvenile phases. The size of the young-of-the-year before their first winter is an important factor for subsequent survival, year class formation, and population dynamics of many fish species and populations. Here, we investigate how the change in spawning location of the Barents Sea population of Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua) may affect the mean individual size of the offspring in their first fall. We demonstrate how the observed climate warming-related northerly shift in spawning location may lead to smaller sizes of young-of-the-year cod. Our analysis reveals a positive effect of sea temperature on offspring size and a nonlinear effect of spawning stock biomass (SSB) with smaller offspring size at both the high and low end of SSB. Decreased offspring size is likely to affect population dynamics through reduced recruitment success, and we hypothesize that it may have been part of the reason for this population's recent reduction in biomass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".