A comprehensive guide to MMR testing in gynecological and gastrointestinal cancers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last 15 years, mismatch repair (MMR) protein status has become one of the essential tools for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic interventions in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and endometrial carcinoma (EC) patient care. While MMR assessment with immunohistochemistry (IHC) protein analysis is routine in large Canadian laboratories, this test suffers from its deceptive simplicity, disguising the nuance of pathologist proficiency readout. Given the high prevalence of MMR-deficient tumours in CRC (18-20%) and ECs (25-28%), and the importance of treatment and prognostic options for patients, it is paramount that pathologists have a comprehensive understanding of the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytic steps of MMR IHC implementation and interpretation for success. This article aims to review MMR testing in CRC and EC and provide strategies to address common pitfalls encountered with MMR interpretation in daily pathology practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".