MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410849203 · doi:10.3138/seminar.61.2.1

Introduction: Relational Ethics in German Studies and in the German University Context

2025· article· en· W4410849203 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Markus Hallensleben

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanContext (archaeology)SociologyPolitical scienceHistoryPhilosophyLinguisticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By contributing to the relational turn, this forum strives to address how we can practically decolonize and indigenize the field of German studies, as well as related fields, such as European studies, cultural studies, and migration studies. How can we build collaborative, supportive, community-oriented, participant-centred, Indigenous-led and arts-based methods into the teaching and research of German studies? With our contributions, we hope to participate in an ongoing ethical relational engagement that brings about behavioural change in regard to how we undertake our academic work, be it teaching, research, or administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicGerman Colonialism and Identity StudiesFrench-language works237,207