MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410851584 · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000002563

Processed foods in the context of a vegan diet, and changes in body weight and severe hot flashes in postmenopausal women: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

2025· article· en· W4410851584 on OpenAlexaff
Hana Kahleová, Tatiana Znayenko‐Miller, Giulianna Motoa, Laura Chiavaroli, Richard Holubkov, Neal D. Barnard

Bibliographic record

VenueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Randomized controlled trialPostmenopausal womenMedicineVegan DietBody weightFood scienceInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: A plant-based diet has been shown to reduce hot flashes, partly by weight loss. Because some plant-based foods are highly processed, this secondary analysis assessed associations between consumption of processed foods, body weight, and severe hot flashes in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Participants (N=84) were randomly assigned to a low-fat vegan diet supplemented with soybeans (n=42) or an omnivorous control group (n=42) for 12 weeks. Three-day diet records were analyzed using the Nutrition Data System for Research software; the NOVA classification was used to assess processed food consumption. A repeated measures ANOVA was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Consumption of unprocessed or minimally processed animal foods decreased in the vegan group, compared with the control group; effect size: -106 g/d (95% CI: -169 to -42); P=0.002. The reduction in consumption of unprocessed or minimally processed animal foods was associated with weight loss (r=+0.45; P<0.001) and a reduction in severe hot flashes (r=+0.31; P=0.01). Similarly, consumption of ultra-processed animal foods decreased in the vegan group by 60 g/d (95% CI: -105 to -15); P=0.004, with no significant change in the control group; effect size: -65 g/d (95% CI: -115 to -16); P=0.01. The reduction in consumption of ultra-processed animal foods was associated with weight loss (r=+0.43; P<0.001). Consumption of ultra-processed plant-based foods changed only minimally and nonsignificantly and was not associated with changes in weight or hot flash frequency. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, in the context of a soybean-supplemented vegan diet, replacing the consumption of both unprocessed or minimally processed and ultra-processed animal foods with plant foods (regardless of the level of processing), was associated with significant weight loss and a reduction in severe hot flashes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause SocietySame topicConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingFrench-language works237,207