MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410852397 · doi:10.4324/9781003591634-35

Jagannath Prasad Das (1931–)

2025· book-chapter· en· W4410852397 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rauno Parrila

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Economics and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrasadPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter presents an overview of J.P. Das’s influential research career, highlighting his early dissertation work on hypnosis and reactive inhibition, and his collaboration with Neil O’Connor in the area of developmental disabilities. In India, he broadened his research focus to include verbal conditioning and the impacts of adverse environments on cognitive skills, particularly among disadvantaged children. At the University of Alberta, his investigations centred on the attentional processes in individuals with mental retardation. Notably, Das’s 1973 study revealed how cultural deprivation affects cognitive processes in children from various backgrounds, establishing a link between nutrition, environment, and cognitive performance. His development of the PASS theory of intelligence provided a framework for understanding cognitive processing, leading to the creation of standardized assessments such as the DN-CAS and CAS2. Later, he concentrated on interventions to improve cognitive abilities and academic performance in learning disabled and culturally disadvantaged children, notably through programmes like the PASS Reading Enhancement Programme (PREP) and Cognition Enhancement Training (COGENT). These initiatives aimed to enhance cognitive and literacy skills, demonstrating significant impacts across clinical and educational contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgricultural Economics and PracticesFrench-language works237,207