MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410852494 · doi:10.1103/msvx-1drx

Enhancing the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm in systems with large condition numbers

2025· article· en· W4410852494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyJapan Science and Technology AgencyMinistry of Electronics and Information technologyDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsHarrowComputer scienceAlgorithmBiologyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm offers an exponential speedup in system size for treating linear equations of the form <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>A</a:mi> <a:mover accent="true"> <a:mi>x</a:mi> <a:mo>⃗</a:mo> </a:mover> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mover accent="true"> <a:mi>b</a:mi> <a:mo>⃗</a:mo> </a:mover> </a:mrow> </a:math> on quantum computers when compared to their traditional counterparts, it faces a challenge related to the condition number ( <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:mi>κ</d:mi> </d:math> ) scaling of the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mi>A</e:mi> </e:math> matrix. In this work, we address the issue by introducing the postselection-improved HHL (Psi-HHL) framework that operates on a simple yet effective premise: subtracting mixed and wrong signals to extract correct signals while providing the benefit of optimal scaling in the condition number of <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mi>A</f:mi> </f:math> (denoted as <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mi>κ</g:mi> </g:math> ) for large <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <h:mi>κ</h:mi> </h:math> scenarios. This approach, which leads to minimal increase in circuit depth, has the important practical implication of having to use substantially fewer shots relative to the traditional HHL algorithm. The term “signal” refers to a feature of <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <i:mrow> <i:mo>|</i:mo> <i:mi>x</i:mi> <i:mo>〉</i:mo> </i:mrow> </i:math> . We design circuits for overlap and expectation value estimation in the Psi-HHL framework. We demonstrate performance of Psi-HHL via numerical simulations. We carry out two sets of computations, where we go up to 26-qubit calculations, to demonstrate the ability of Psi-HHL to handle situations involving large- <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <j:mi>κ</j:mi> </j:math> matrices via (a) a set of toy matrices, for which we go up to size <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <k:mrow> <k:mn>64</k:mn> <k:mo>×</k:mo> <k:mn>64</k:mn> </k:mrow> </k:math> and <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <l:mi>κ</l:mi> </l:math> values of up to <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo>≈</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>×</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mn>10</m:mn> <m:mn>6</m:mn> </m:msup> </m:mrow> </m:math> , and (b) application to quantum chemistry, where we consider matrices up to size <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <n:mrow> <n:mn>256</n:mn> <n:mo>×</n:mo> <n:mn>256</n:mn> </n:mrow> </n:math> that reach <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <o:mi>κ</o:mi> </o:math> of about 393. The molecular systems that we consider are <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <p:msub> <p:mi>Li</p:mi> <p:mn>2</p:mn> </p:msub> </p:math> , KH, RbH, and CsH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it