MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410852518 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3575039

An Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Controller to Enhance Power Sharing in Distributed Energy Resources Applications

2025· article· en· W4410852518 on OpenAlexafffund
Seyedmohammad Hasheminasab, Mohamad Alzayed, Hicham Chaoui

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed generationController (irrigation)Distributed computingFuzzy logicElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceRenewable energyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In inverter-interfaced microgrids, droop control techniques are essential for regulating active and reactive power exchange. However, their performance is compromised by the varying impedance of the feeder and the slow response to dynamic load changes, leading to power-sharing inaccuracies. This paper proposes an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)-based virtual impedance controller to address this issue and enhance active and reactive power sharing. The proposed controller dynamically adjusts a virtual voltage to compensate for impedance mismatches, modifying the reference voltage of the inverter. This enables precise power tracking with minimal deviation from the defined reference values and a faster response under transient conditions, including startup and external disturbances. The ANFIS framework integrates fuzzy logic and neural networks, eliminating the limitations of manual and separate tuning in conventional controllers and improving performance in nonlinear systems. The controller’s performance is validated on an IEEE 39-bus test system under various scenarios, including charging, discharging, and transient disturbances. It is tested with three battery sizes (1 MW, 96 kW, and 75 kW) under the same controller setup to assess scalability. Training with per-unit data ensures scalability across different battery capacities and distributed generators. The results are compared to traditional methods to demonstrate the controller’s superior effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207