MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410852546 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2025.3573231

A Robust Solver for Phasor-Domain Short-Circuit Analysis With Inverter-Based Resources

2025· article· en· W4410852546 on OpenAlexaff
Aboutaleb Haddadi, Xinquan Chen, Evangelos Farantatos, Ilhan Koçar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorSolverComputer scienceInverterElectronic engineeringProblem solverShort circuitElectrical engineeringEngineeringElectric power systemVoltagePhysicsComputational sciencePower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of Inverter-Based Resource (IBR) model into phasor-domain short circuit (SC) solvers challenges their numerical stability. To address the challenge, this paper proposes a solver that improves numerical stability by employing the Newton-Raphson iterative method. The solver can integrate the latest implementation of IBR SC model in industry-standard fault analysis programs including the voltage controlled current source tabular model as well as vendor-specific black-box and white-box equation-based models. The superior numerical stability of the proposed solver has been mathematically demonstrated, with identified convergence conditions. An algorithm for the implementation of the proposed solver in fault analysis programs has been developed. The objective is to improve the capability of the industry to accurately represent IBRs in SC studies and ensure system protection reliability in an IBR-dominated future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207