MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410852778 · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.7529

Platelet Transfusion

2025· article· en· W4410852778 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan A. Metcalf, Susan Nahirniak, Gordon Guyatt, Aarti Bathla, Sandra White, Arwa Z. Al‐Riyami, Rachel Jug, Ursula La Rocca, Jeannie Callum, Claudia S. Cohn, Abe DeAnda, Robert A. DeSimone, Allan Dubon, Lise J Estcourt, Daniela Filipescu, Mark Fung, Ruchika Goel, Aaron S. Hess, Heather Hume, Richard M. Kaufman, Peter Kranke, Vernon Louw, Morten Hylander Møller, Michael Murphy, Jennifer A. Muszynski, Cian O′Kelly, Monica B. Pagano, Gopal Kumar Patidar, Katerina Pavenski, Jacqueline N. Poston, Nabiha H. Saifee, Moritz Stolla, Zbigniew M. Szczepiorkowski, Aaron A.R. Tobian, Raman Uberoi, Jonathan H. Waters, Brittney Williams, Erica M. Wood, Nicole D. Zantek, Michelle P. Zeller, Brenda J. Grossman, Simon Stanworth

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoKingston Health Sciences CentreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversitySunnybrook HospitalCanadian Blood ServicesUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicinePlatelet transfusionPlateletRandomized controlled trialObservational studyLumbar punctureSurgeryInternal medicineIntensive care medicineCerebrospinal fluid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Platelet transfusion is a frequent procedure with benefits and risks. Objective: To provide recommendations in adult and pediatric populations in whom platelet transfusions are commonly performed. Evidence Review: Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to findings from 21 randomized trials and 13 observational studies in contexts of limited randomized clinical trial data. Transfusion strategies using fewer (restrictive) vs greater (liberal) amounts of platelets were compared. Findings: Evidence demonstrated that restrictive transfusion strategies probably did not cause increases in mortality or bleeding relative to liberal strategies across predefined clinical populations. Exceedingly low incidence of spinal hematoma was identified in patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing lumbar puncture. Because definitions of restrictive strategies varied across trials, recommendations reflect practical guidance. The following recommendations are strong recommendations with high/moderate-certainty evidence. For hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia in nonbleeding patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant, platelet transfusion is recommended when platelet count is less than 10 × 103/μL. For consumptive thrombocytopenia in neonates without major bleeding, platelet transfusion is recommended when platelet count is less than 25 × 103/μL. In patients undergoing lumbar puncture, platelet transfusion is recommended when platelet count is less than 20 × 103/μL. In patients with consumptive thrombocytopenia due to Dengue without major bleeding, platelet transfusion is not recommended. The following recommendations are conditional recommendations with low/very low-certainty evidence. For hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia in nonbleeding adults undergoing autologous stem cell transplant or with aplastic anemia, prophylactic platelet transfusion is not recommended. In adults with consumptive thrombocytopenia without major bleeding, platelet transfusion is recommended when platelet count is less than 10 × 103/μL. In adults undergoing central venous catheter placement in compressible anatomic sites, platelet transfusion is recommended when platelet count is less than 10 × 103/μL. In adults undergoing interventional radiology, platelet transfusion is recommended when platelet count is less than 20 × 103/μL for low-risk procedures and less than 50 × 103/μL for high-risk procedures. For adults undergoing major nonneuraxial surgery, platelet transfusion is recommended when platelet count is less than 50 × 103/μL. For patients without thrombocytopenia undergoing cardiovascular surgery in the absence of major hemorrhage, including those receiving cardiopulmonary bypass, platelet transfusion is not recommended. For nonoperative intracranial hemorrhage in adults with platelet count greater than 100 × 103/μL, including those receiving antiplatelet agents, platelet transfusion is not recommended. Conclusions And Relevance: A consistent pattern of evidence supports the implementation of restrictive platelet transfusion strategies. Restrictive strategies reduce risk of adverse reactions, mitigate platelet shortages, and reduce costs. It is good practice to consider overall clinical context and alternative therapies in the decision to perform platelet transfusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMASame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207