MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410856000 · doi:10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.102907

Effect of dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine transversus abdominis plane block on analgesia and cognitive impairment risk in colorectal cancer surgery

2025· article· en· W4410856000 on OpenAlex
Xing Zhang, Guangming Xiang, Zhixin Wang, Mingqing Peng, Min Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDexmedetomidineMedicineRopivacaineAnesthesiaColorectal cancerCognitive impairmentSurgeryBlock (permutation group theory)CancerCognitionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND The dexmedetomidine (DEX) plus ropivacaine treatment enables a transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) of the peripheral nerves in patients undergoing radical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) that can provide clinical data for improving the postoperative analgesic effect, reducing the risk of cognitive impairment, and decreasing the circulating levels of serum inflammatory factors and stress hormones. AIM To assess the impact of DEX plus ropivacaine-enabled TAPB on pain, postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), and inflammatory/stress factors. METHODS Our patient cohort was randomly divided into control and observation groups (60/group). The observation group used a DEX plus ropivacaine-enabled TAPB, while the control group employed a ropivacaine-enabled TAPB. The pain score [Visual Analogy Scale (VAS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)], serum inflammatory factor level (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α), serum stress hormone levels (cortisol and adrenaline) and postoperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The observation group VAS scores were lower than those of the control group (better analgesic effect, P < 0.05). The MoCA and POCD scores decreased post-surgery in the observation group (P < 0.05). In the elderly, the overall VAS and MoCA scores were significantly reduced compared with the young group. The C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, cortisol and adrenaline levels were lower in the observation group compared with the control group post-surgery (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups post-surgery, but the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was still lower. DEX continuously inhibited p65-phosphorylation levels in the nuclear factor κB pathway at multiple time points, and its inhibitory effect became more significant over time. CONCLUSION DEX plus ropivacaine-enabled TAPB reduces POCD and inflammatory/stress hormone levels, and significantly improves the postoperative analgesic effect of patients undergoing radical resection for colorectal cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it