MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410859437 · doi:10.1049/wss2.70008

IoT‐Based Food Quality Monitoring System

2025· article· en· W4410859437 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Wireless Sensor Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)BusinessComputer scienceFood qualityFood scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The demand for fast, precise, and sensitive food safety methods is growing as consumers increasingly rely on online food delivery services. Food products shipped from South America to Europe can spend more than 21 days in transit, often resulting in deterioration, mould, or pathogen growth. Similar risks apply in the food service industry, where food may have been stored or handled improperly, leading to foodborne illness. This paper presents the Edispotter, an IoT‐based food quality monitoring system designed to address these and similar issues. Using Raspberry Pi and ESP32, the Edispotter collects essential food quality data through various sensors. The data are processed and stored in a Redis database within an Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud environment, providing real‐time food‐based status updates via an Android application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it