MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410862925 · doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101584

Long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate and physical activity with mortality and cardiovascular events: an analysis of the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE)-China cohort study

2025· article· en· W4410862925 on OpenAlexafffund
Jun Hao, Zhiguang Liu, Bo Hu, Duolao Wang, Sumathy Rangarajan, Yang Wang, Chuangshi Wang, Lap Ah Tse, Weida Liu, Sidong Li, Minghai Yan, Qiujing Cai, Salim Yusuf, Wei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersFuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesServierCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChinese Academy of Medical SciencesPeking Union Medical College HospitalNational Children's Research CentreGlaxoSmithKlineHamilton Health SciencesSanofiHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaAstraZeneca
KeywordsEpidemiologyParticulatesEnvironmental healthChinaProspective cohort studyTerm (time)MedicineCohort studyPhysical activityGerontologyCohortDemographyGeographyPhysical therapyInternal medicineEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Long-term exposure to PM2.5 and low physical activity are independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, there is limited research investigating the combined effects of PM2.5 exposure and physical activity on CVD risk. This study aims to explore these interactions related to CVD and mortality. Methods: We analysed data from the PURE-China cohort, including 39,970 adults aged 35-70 years, with a median follow-up of 11.9 years. PM2.5 exposure was estimated using a Bayesian hierarchical model. Physical activity was quantified using metabolic equivalent task (MET)-minutes per week. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular events. Cox frailty models and restricted cubic splines were used to assess associations. Interaction effects were evaluated using measures of multiplicative and additive interaction, including the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and the proportion attributable to interaction (AP). Findings: ). In low-exposure areas, higher total physical activity significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97, p trend = 0.012) and major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.80, 0.67-0.95, p trend = 0.022). However, in high-exposure regions, physical activity showed no protective effect for the composite outcome (HR: 0.97, 0.85-1.09, p trend = 0.551) and major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.98, 0.85-1.13, p trend = 0.864). Higher non-recreational physical activity reduced the risks of composite outcome and major CVD in low-exposure areas but provided no benefit in high-exposure regions (p interaction = 0.011, 0.024, respectively). Significant antagonistic interaction was observed between high PM2.5 exposure and low non-recreational physical activity for the composite outcome (RERI: -0.215, 95% CI: -0.406 to -0.024; AP: -0.155, 95% CI: -0.294 to -0.017). Interpretation: Long-term exposure to high PM2.5 concentrations diminishes the cardiovascular benefits of physical activity, particularly non-recreational activities. These findings underscore the need for tailored physical activity guidelines and air quality interventions in heavily polluted regions to maximize public health benefits. Funding: Funding sources are listed at the end of the Article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Regional Health - Western PacificSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207