MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410866880 · doi:10.1080/0268117x.2025.2506572

Adapting a text and ideology: the influence of Locke’s <i>Two Treatises</i> on Southerne’s <i>Oroonoko</i>

2025· article· en· W4410866880 on OpenAlex
Benjamin Woodford

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Seventeenth Century · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyLiteraturePhilosophyArtPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The play Oroonoko (1695) by Thomas Southerne adapted the novel of the same name by Aphra Behn (1688). Between the publication of Behn’s novel and the first performance of Southerne’s play, England experienced profound political change. In adapting Behn’s novel for the stage, Southerne altered the story to reflect the political ideology of the Whigs, who dominated English politics in the 1690s. Each version of Oroonoko relates to the writings of two rivals in seventeenth-century political thought: Sir Robert Filmer and John Locke. Southerne, when he adapted Behn’s novel, replaced the ideas of Filmer with those of Locke, especially in regard to the state of nature and the right to rebel against a tyrant. Southerne’s embrace of Locke’s philosophy also aligned him with his prospective patron, the prominent Whig, William Cavendish, the 1st Duke of Devonshire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it