MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410867794 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.107291

An Expert Consensus Framework for a Database on Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility and Protein Quality Scoring From Foods Consumed by Humans

2025· article· en· W4410867794 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Tomé, Juliane Calvez, Rajavel Elango, Eduardo Ferriolli, Claire Gaudichon, Glenda Courtney‐Martin, Fei Han, María Hayes, Suzanne M. Hodgkinson, Anura V. Kurpad, Jurriaan J. Mes, Victor Owino, Isidra Recio, Shruti Prasad Shertukde, Hans Stein, Antonios Vlassopoulos, Maria Xipsiti

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenInstitute of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)Protein qualityProtein digestibilityFood scienceComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Food Protein Quality is best measured by the amino acid scoring that relates their indispensable amino acid content to a reference profile after correction for digestibility. Digestibility is measured at the terminal ileum for calculation of the ileal Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (ileal-PDCAAS) and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS). In 2022, the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) decided to create a database on amino acid oro-ileal digestibility for protein quality scoring of human foods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.121
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.189
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1210.189
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0190.017
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0140.013
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207