MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410868990 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.106744

The Positive Impact of Mandatory Food Fortification: A Population-Stratified Analysis of Change in Health Status

2025· article· en· W4410868990 on OpenAlexaff
Mica Jenkins, Helena Pachón, Shruthi Cyriac, Mathilde Maurel, Marie Krottenthaler

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsNutrition International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental healthFood fortificationPopulationBusinessPopulation healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The Global Fortification Data Exchange collates and visualizes effectiveness data (i.e. from surveys and program evaluations) on change in health status after the initiation of mandatory food fortification. To date, data have been reviewed and uploaded for 88 countries, 5 food vehicles, and 6 nutrients. The purpose of the current study is to analyze these data by health outcome and population group to determine whether health status has changed and where gaps in the data remain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.239
GPT teacher head0.531
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207