Neonatal White Matter Microstructure Predicts Infant Attention Disengagement from Fearful Faces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Infants develop an attentional bias towards faces already at birth, with further specification towards fearful faces emerging at 6 months and diminishing around 11 months of age. However, the neurobiological origins of attentional bias to fear are still poorly understood. To understand the neural structures underlying perception of facial expressions, the current study utilized newborn diffusion magnetic resonance images (N = 86; 41 females; μ = 27.15 days) and eye tracking from the same infants at 8-months (μ = 8.75 months) as a behavioural measure. An overlap paradigm was used to measure attention disengagement from fearful, happy, and neutral faces. Tract-based spatial statistics revealed that higher white matter (WM) mean diffusivity in widespread regions across the brain was associated with lower attention disengagement from fearful faces. The same association was found with happy faces but was limited to only the splenium of the corpus callosum and sensorimotor pathways. Variance in neonatal WM microstructure may reflect individual differences in growth that is related to attentional bias development later in infancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".