MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

USING TWO-EYED SEEING TO DOCUMENT CLIMATE IMPACTS TO SEA ICE IN RESOLUTE BAY, NUNAVUT, CANADA

2025· article· en· W4410871072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex Forsythe, Ioan Nistor

Bibliographic record

VenueCoastal Engineering Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayOceanographySea iceGeographyClimate changeClimatologyEnvironmental scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most visible impacts of climate change in Arctic environments is declining sea ice. Sea ice is declining in its spatial extent, thickness, and duration of the ice-covered season. Historical trends in sea ice change have been well documented on an Arctic wide scale (Moon, 2021 and Thoman 2020). This study seeks to document historical trends in air temperature, sea ice thickness (SIT), break-up dates (BUDs) and freeze-up dates (FUDs), to correlate sea ice behavior to air temperatures, and to document the socio- economic impacts of sea ice change in Resolute Bay Nunavut, Canada using traditional Inuit knowledge (TIK) and scientific methods. This is the first study of its kind conducted in Resolute Bay. Traditional Inuit or Indigenous knowledge have been incorporated into scientific studies using two-eyed seeing in other studies seeking to understand the physical and natural environment (Abu 2019 and Michie 2018). This study is the first application of these methods to characterize climate impacts to sea ice in an Arctic Inuit community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCoastal Engineering ProceedingsSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207