MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410871159 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v15n7p236

‘Magical Realism’ Existentialized in Saadawi’s Frankenstein in Baghdad

2025· article· en· W4410871159 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Deema Ammari, Dina Salman

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Magical Realism, García Márquez
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealismPhilosophyLiteratureArtEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the very onset of its literary transformation, magical realism has taken on Postcolonial and Postmodern stances toward the appropriation of cultural identity. Normalizing the invasion of cultural history and heritage – having become long-forgotten myths of culture – in a modernized setting, gives cultural identity the presencing urgency its authenticity requires, thus creating a postcolonial text or a postmodern individual reminded of an indigenous identity. However, from the standpoint of a war-torn country, this paper argues that the genre requires immediate presencing of existential nature to that which invokes cultural heritage. In other words, in the context of war, an immediate act of presencing is required as otherwise the subject’s inaction may be the cause of not mere identity but also physical nonexistence. In this sense, immediate urgency affected by direct contact with chaos is understood to require a more immediate approach than those offered by postcolonialism and postmodernism. The study then investigates the possibility of fathoming magical realism from an Existential lens within the context of war as projected in Ahmed Saadawi’s Frankenstein in Baghdad, especially when a calling shifts from individual retribution to victimization, thus taking the analysis typically associated with the genre a step further.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicLiterature, Magical Realism, García MárquezFrench-language works237,207