MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410871205 · doi:10.5267/j.jpm.2025.4.003

You are entitled to access the full text of this documentEnhancing sustainable performance through circular economy: The mediating roles of green supply chain and process innovation ,

2025· article· en· W4410871205 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sultan Alateeg, Sura I. Al-Ayed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Project Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainBusinessCircular economyProcess (computing)Industrial organizationInnovation processProcess managementMarketingComputer scienceWork in processBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the relationships between circular economy capability, green supply chain, green process innovation, and sustainable performance in the manufacturing sector of Saudi Arabia. As the country transitions toward its Vision 2030 goals, which emphasize sustainability and economic diversification, the manufacturing sector plays a critical role in adopting circular economy principles and green practices to reduce environmental impact and enhance resource efficiency. Using a cross-sectional research design, data were collected from managerial-level employees through a structured questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that circular economy capability significantly drives green supply chain and green process innovation, which in turn enhance sustainable performance. The study also identifies green supply chain and green process innovation as critical mediators in the relationship between circular economy capability and sustainable performance. The results highlight the importance of integrating circular economy principles with green practices to achieve sustainability goals. It provides actionable insights for organizations to enhance their sustainability efforts, such as investing in resource efficiency, adopting green supply chain practices, and fostering process innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2840.122

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Project ManagementSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207