MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410874222 · doi:10.1177/10443894251329423

Family Needs and Service Trajectory During the Transition to School for Children With Autism

2025· article· en· W4410874222 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Céline Chatenoud, Rivard Mélina, Marie Millau, Chun‐Yu Chiu, Souissi Fatine, Magnan Charlotte, Zakaria Mestari

Bibliographic record

VenueFamilies in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNetworks of Centres of Excellence of Canada
KeywordsAutismTransition (genetics)PsychologySocial workDevelopmental psychologyService (business)TrajectoryMedical educationMedicinePolitical scienceGeneticsBusinessLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition to school is challenging for families of children with autism, especially in the context of socioemotional and behavioral challenges. This study focuses on the needs of 64 parents of children with autism in Montreal during the transition from early behavioral services to school through the lens of the family needs assessment model. The research team collected data on family needs and socio-behavioral profiles at two critical periods during the school transition: the beginning and end of the first school year in kindergarten. Results indicated that the support needs expressed by parents to facilitate their child’s school transition are evolving and time-sensitive, particularly concerning children’s complex needs, education, and disability-related services, with family needs decreasing over the course of the year. The study underscores the necessity for diverse support throughout the transition period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFamilies in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social ServicesSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207