MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410876409 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.053

Intersectionality and Unpaid Caregiving: Implications for Caregiver’s Health and Well-being Across Cultures in Canada

2025· article· en· W4410876409 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Parry, Krupal Patel, Fateh Tavangar, D. Baiden, Rinat Nissim, Raquel Betini, Helen Burnside, D. Gaetano, Salima Hemani, Nicole Nickerson, C. Norris, Tasneem Owadally, L. Pilote, Pamela Baxter, Amy Coupal, Syed Zaheer Hasan, Mary Ho, O. Kulbak, Shvan H. Mohammed, Laura Mullaly, J. Theriault, Wendy Wu, Arland O’Hara, Elizabeth Peter

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersectionalitySociologyGender studiesGerontologyPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

emphasized the need for accessible materials and communitybased education.These findings guided the development of a script that promotes equity and addresses Korean women's unique risks.CONCLUSIONS: This project highlights the importance of culturally tailored interventions in addressing health disparities.By empowering Korean immigrant women with culturally relevant knowledge, this project aligns with equity-promoting strategies and serves as a model for engaging other underserved communities in cardiovascular health education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFrench-language works237,207