MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410877688 · doi:10.46827/ejpe.v12i2.5819

CANADIAN UNIVERSITY WOMEN’S BASKETBALL IN THE ZONE: AN EXAMINATION OF FLOW STATE EXPERIENCES

2025· article· en· W4410877688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFlow Experience in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasketballPsychologyState (computer science)Flow (mathematics)Mathematics educationHistoryComputer scienceMathematicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since first proposed by Csikszentmihalyi in 1975, flow theory has been studied in work environments, education, leisure studies, and sports; however, investigations corresponding to flow in sports typically have been restricted to individual performances, with little research into team sports and even less in women’s team sports. This study investigated eight case studies of female university basketball players at Canadian universities. While confirming previous research into flow experiences, the study also identified some key factors, such as the relatively rare occurrence of flow experiences, the fragility of flow experiences, and the differential impact on individual players of the nine characteristics of flow. In addition, the study identified factors for coaches who wish to optimize flow experiences for their teams.<p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0819/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it