MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410885092 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555417

CHEX-MATE: Exploring the kinematical properties of Planck galaxy clusters

2025· article· en· W4410885092 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lorenzo Pizzuti, R. Barrena, M. Sereno, A. Streblyanska, A. Ferragamo, Sophie Maurogordato, A. Cappi, S. Ettori, W. Gabriel Pratt, G. Castignani, Megan Donahue, D. Eckert, F. Gastaldello, R. Gavazzi, Paul Haines, Scott T. Kay, L. Lovisari, B. J. Maughan, É. Pointecouteau, Elena Rasia, M. Radovich, Jack Sayers

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAstrophysics DivisionHorizon 2020Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesNuclear Safety and Security CommissionScience and Technology Facilities CouncilInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasEuropean CommissionAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsNextGenerationEUNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsPlanckGalaxyAstronomyGalaxy formation and evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analysed the kinematical properties of the CHEX-MATE galaxy cluster sample. Our study is based on the radial velocities retrieved from the SDSS DR18, DESI, and NED spectroscopic databases and new data obtained with the 10.4 m GTC and ESO-NTT telescopes. We derived cluster mass profiles for 75 clusters using the MG-MAMPOSST procedure, which recovers the gravitational potential and the anisotropy profiles from line-of-sight velocities and projected positions of galaxy members. The standard Navarro–Frenk–White (NFW) model and the Burkert model, with flatter cores than the NFW, both adequately fit the kinematic data, with only a marginal statistical preference for one model over the other. An estimation of the mass bias (1−B1) = M500SZ/M500M was performed via a comparison with Sunyaev-Zel’dovich–X-ray-calibrated mass estimates, resulting in a value of 0.54 ± 0.11 when four evidently disturbed clusters are removed from the sample. We assessed the dynamical state of the clusters by inferring the Anderson-Darling coefficient (A2) and the fraction of galaxies in substructures (fsub). Except for a few cases, we find relatively low values for A2, which suggests that CHEX-MATE clusters are not too far from relaxation. Moreover, no significant trends emerge between A2 and fsub, nor between the log-masses estimated by MG-MAMPOSST and those based on the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect calibrated through X-rays measurements. We studied the concentration–mass relation for the sample; despite the large scatter, we observe signs of an increasing trend for high-mass clusters, in agreement with recent theoretical expectations. Finally, our analysis of the radial anisotropy profiles of member galaxies – stacked in five bins of mass and redshift – reveals that orbits tend to be isotropic at the centre and more radial towards the edge, as found in previous studies. A slight trend of increasing radial orbits at r200 is observed in clusters with larger velocity dispersions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→