MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhancing Iot Intrusion Detection With Transformer-Based Network Traffic Classification

2025· article· en· W4410887512 on OpenAlexaff
Samar AboulEla, Rasha Kashef

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemInternet of ThingsComputer networkIntrusion prevention systemTransformerComputer securityEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fast rise of cyber threats has exposed flaws in traditional intrusion detection systems (IDS), particularly in the Internet of Things (IoT) context. Large language models (LLMs) and other deep learning techniques provide sophisticated skills for recognizing intricate attack patterns, which can enhance IDS capabilities. Using two benchmark datasets, we conducted a comparative analysis of IoT network intrusion detection using encoder-based Transformer models and two baseline deep learning models. Experiments on the NF-BoT-IoT and NF-ToN-IoT datasets showed that the evaluated transformer models (BERT-tiny, Electrasmall, and DistilBERT) performed well in binary and multi-class classification tasks. By utilizing self-attention mechanisms, these models surpass the baseline models in capturing crucial context. According to our experiments, the best binary classification accuracies were 99.38 % and 99.98 % for the NF-BoT-IoT and NF-ToN-IoT datasets, respectively. In multi-class classification, DistilBERT achieved the highest accuracy (84.35 %) on the NF-BoT-IoT dataset, whereas BERT-tiny achieved the highest accuracy ($\mathbf{7 2. 7 \%}$) on the NF-ToN-IoT dataset. For the Baseline models, multi-layer perceptron (MLP) demonstrated competitive binary classification performance with low processing costs, whereas long short term memory (LSTM) struggled with multiclass classification, highlighting Transformer models' superiority for high-dimensional, multi-class data. Our findings validate Transformer models' suitability for sophisticated intrusion detection systems, providing significant improvements in detection accuracy and overall efficiency across complicated attack scenarios in IoT networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207