Authorship and Collective Self-Fashioning in Pre-Confederation English Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter explores the ways that periodical writers in pre-Confederation Canada actively formulated ideas about colonial authorship that fostered connections between literary expression and the possibilities of civic intervention. These writers repeatedly expressed a concern with the hurdles and character of colonial authorship, and an interest in the larger public role that they could play in the emergence of a distinct colonial identity. In an age that was marked by considerable political unrest but also cultural and intellectual fermentation, periodical writers raised important questions about the role of a domestic literature as both a pedagogical force (a vehicle of enlightenment) and a powerful means of imagining contending forms of provincial, regional, and proto-national community. Focusing on a range of nineteenth-century periodicals, from The Acadian Recorder (Halifax, 1813–53), to The Literary Garland (Montreal, 1838–51), to The Canadian Literary Magazine (York, 1833), the chapter explores the network of competing narratives about the connections between authorship and the production of disparate forms of civic agency and moral consensus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".