MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410892862 · doi:10.62463/surgery.180

Interventions to reduce short term post-operative mortality in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of randomised controlled trials.

2025· review· en· W4410892862 on OpenAlexaff
L Phelan, Mafalda Sampaio-Alves, Anita Eseenam Agbeko, Parvez Haque, Dmitri Nepogodiev, Aneel Bhangu, James Glasbey

Bibliographic record

VenueImpact Surgery · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)Psychological interventionTerm (time)MedicineRandomized controlled trialLow and middle income countriesIntensive care medicineDeveloping countryAlternative medicineSurgeryEconomicsPsychiatryEconomic growthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Post-operative mortality is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are at disproportionately increased risk, and it is likely that many deaths are avoidable and preventable. We aim to consolidate evidence on interventions tested in a randomised setting to reduce short term post-operative mortality following non-cardiac surgery in LMICs. Methods: We will conduct a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials of interventions aimed at reducing short term post-operative mortality in Low- and Middle-Income countries. Short term mortality is defined as within 90 days of surgery. Trials will be included if they pertain to non-cardiac surgery in both elective and emergency settings and report mortality as their primary outcome. If trials are conducted across multiple countries, we will include them if we are able to extract the LMIC data separately. Our primary aim is to consolidate evidence on interventions tested in a randomised setting to reduce short term post-operative mortality. We will achieve this by several secondary outcomes which are to identify the number of RCTs of interventions tested in this context; describe the interventions, their components, and their timing on the patient pathway; the geographical location the trials were conducted and the adherence to the interventions. Finally, we will describe the impact on mortality of the interventions. Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Data on individual components of each intervention will be collected and thematically coded and grouped. We will use these groupings to map each intervention across the surgical pathway from the pre-operative phase and decision for surgery to postoperative rehabilitation. Formal ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Discussion: Despite reductions in perioperative mortality globally in the last 50 years, post-operative mortality is the third leading cause of death, with 4.2 million people dying within 30 days of an operation each year. This systematic review will identify and discuss interventions tested in a randomised setting to reduce short-term post-operative mortality following non-cardiac surgery in LMICs. This will inform future trial design by identifying successful interventions or knowledge gaps in the patient pathway in which interventions have not been tested. Prospero registration number: CRD42024604760

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.163
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.193
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1630.193
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0240.027
Bibliometrics0.0140.018
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0070.007
Research integrity0.0120.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImpact SurgerySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207