MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410896890 · doi:10.51644/bap72

The Geopolitical Rivalry behind US Chip Export Controls and Its Implications for Canada’s Semiconductor Autonomy

2025· article· en· W4410896890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fred Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenueBalsillie Papers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRivalryGeopoliticsAutonomySemiconductor industryInternational tradePolitical scienceEconomic geographyEconomicsEngineeringLawManufacturing engineeringMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a country with minimal domestic manufacturing capacity, Canada relies heavily on imported chips to power its economy. This dependence has heightened its vulnerability to global supply chain disruptions, a weakness made evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, due to a lack of domestic investment sources and a less developed commercialization environment, Canadian semiconductor firms are increasingly gravitating to the United States in search of funding and technological support, aggravating the sector’s loss of intellectual property (IP) and talent. This trend has also contributed to rising foreign ownership, making Canadian chip firms more likely to be caught by US export controls. This context highlights the urgency for Ottawa to strengthen its domestic semiconductor ecosystem and reduce exposure to geopolitically driven supply chain risks, particularly at a time when the Trump’s administration is seeking to repatriate US overseas semiconductor manufacturing capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBalsillie PapersSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207