Measurement and Modelling of Carbon Dioxide in Triflate-Based Ionic Liquids: Imidazolium, Pyridinium, and Pyrrolidinium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas responsible for global warming, represents today a critical environmental challenge for humans. Mitigating CO2 emissions and other greenhouse gases is a pressing global concern. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the potential of particular ionic liquids (ILs) in capturing CO2 for the sweetening of natural and other gases. The solubility of CO2 was measured in three distinct ILs, which shared a common anion (triflate, TfO) but differed in their cations. The selected ionic liquids were {1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium triflate [BMIM][TfO], 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium triflate [BMP][TfO], and 1-butyl-4-methylpyridium triflate [MBPY][TfO]}. The solvents were screened based on results from a molecular computational study that predicted low CO2 Henry’s Law constants. Solubility measurements were conducted at 303.15 K, 323.15 K, and 343.15 K and pressures up to 1.5 MPa using a gravimetric microbalance (IGA-003). The CO2 experimental results were modeled using the Peng–Robinson Equation of state with three mixing rules: van der Waals one (vdWI), van der Waals two (vdWII), and the non-random two-liquid (NRTL) Wong–Sandler (WS) mixing rule. For the three ILs, the NRTL-WS mixing rule regressed the data with the lowest average deviation percentage of 1.24%. The three solvents had similar alkyl chains but slightly different polarities. [MBPY][TfO], with the largest size, exhibited the highest CO2 solubility at all three temperatures. Calculation of its relative polarity descriptor (N) shows it was the least polar of the three ILs. Conversely, [BMP][TfO] showed the highest Henry’s Law constant (lowest solubility) across the studied temperature range. Comparing the results to published data, the study concludes that triflate-based ionic liquids with three fluorine atoms had lower capacity for CO2 compared to bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide (Tf2N)-based ionic liquids with six fluorine atoms. Additionally, the study provided data on the enthalpy and entropy of absorption. A final comparison shows that the ILs had a lower CO2 capacity than Selexol, a solvent widely used in commercial carbon capture operations. Compared to other ILs, the results confirm that the type of anion had a more significant impact on solubility than the cation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".