Microstructure-Driven Hygrothermal Behavior of Mycelium-Based Composites for Bio-Based Insulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the coupled hygrothermal behavior of mycelium-based composites (MBCs) as a function of their microstructural organization, governed by fungal species, substrate type, additive incorporation, and treatment method. Eleven composite formulations were selected and characterized using a multi-scale experimental approach, combining scanning electron microscopy, dynamic vapor sorption, vapor permeability tests, capillary uptake measurements, and transient thermal conductivity analysis. SEM analysis revealed that Ganoderma lucidum forms dense and interconnected hyphal networks, whereas Trametes versicolor generates looser, localized structures. These morphological differences directly influence water vapor transport and heat conduction. Additive-enriched composites exhibited up to 21.8% higher moisture uptake at 90% RH, while straw-based composites demonstrated higher capillary uptake and free water saturation (up to 704 kg/m3), indicating enhanced moisture sensitivity. In contrast, hemp-based formulations with Ganoderma lucidum showed reduced sorption and vapor permeability due to limited pore interconnectivity. Thermal conductivity varied nonlinearly with temperature and moisture content. Fitting the experimental data with an exponential model revealed a moisture sensitivity coefficient thirty times lower for GHOP compared to VHOP, highlighting the stabilizing effect of a compact microstructure. The distinction between total and effective porosity emerged as a key factor in explaining discrepancies between apparent and functional moisture behavior. These findings demonstrate that hygric and thermal properties in MBCs are governed not by porosity alone, but by the geometry and connectivity of the internal fungal network. Optimizing these structural features enables fine control overheat and mass transfer, laying the groundwork for the development of high-performance, bio-based insulation materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".