MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410901399 · doi:10.1080/15397734.2025.2508329

Stress and frequency optimization of prismatic sandwich beams with structural joints: Improvements through accelerated topology optimization

2025· article· en· W4410901399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTopology Optimization in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTopology optimizationStructural engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Stress (linguistics)Materials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steel sandwich beams and panels with prismatic cores offer a promising alternative to traditional structures in various industries because of their excellent mechanical characteristics. This research explores performance gains by optimizing the core of the beams using a topology optimization (TO) framework to improve stress distribution and natural frequency. The beams include structural joints to the surrounding structures, which has not been investigated before for these types of structures. To address computational demands, accelerated linear finite element (FE) solvers and eigensolvers are employed, specifically adapted for density-based TO to enhance efficiency and maintain accuracy. The inexact recycled implicitly restarted Lanczos method is proposed, providing a novel approach to efficiently solving eigenvalue problems by recycling eigenvectors and relaxing convergence tolerances, significantly speeding up the process. The topology optimized beams are compared to conventional prismatic sandwich beams (X-core, Y-core, corrugated-core, and web-core), which are optimized using a global evolutionary algorithm. Limits on design variables are used to ensure ease of production. The results show that topology optimized beams outperform conventional beams by up to 44% in terms of stress and 18% in terms of frequency, at higher mass levels. Although they resemble conventional beams, optimized core topologies with joints highlight additional improvements and underscore the importance of joint design in optimization. Accelerated solvers reduce computational time by up to 99%, enabling TO to generate Pareto fronts comparable to global sizing optimization. Certain limitations, such as reduced performance at volume fractions below 0.2, indicate potential areas for further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it