MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410904490 · doi:10.18280/acsm.490210

A DFT Investigation of the Thermoelectric Properties of Ca-Doped Bi₂O₂ and Cu₂Se₂ Layers with Respect to the Thermoelectric Performance of BiCuSeO

2025· article· en· W4410904490 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. A. Mohammed, Noor Hatem, Nuha Hadi Jasim Al Hasan, Safaa A. S. Almtori, Zaid H. Obayes

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoelectric effectMaterials scienceDopingThermoelectric materialsCondensed matter physicsEngineering physicsThermodynamicsOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermoelectric properties of doped BiCuSeO are influenced by doping on both the Bi2O2 and Cu2Se2 layers.Density functional theory (DFT) simulations were used in this work to predict thermoelectric performance after doping to both layers of BiCuSeO in order to reduce the monetary and time costs of experimental testing, allowing for more rigorous review of the resulting changes in electrical and thermal conductivity and evaluation of how these modifications can be used to optimize the material's thermoelectric efficiency.Testing whether the various changes to temperature and doping had any substantial impact on the material's thermoelectric properties was done using statistical methodologies.The best results were thus obtained for Bi0.9Ca0.1CuSeO at 950, at a value of 2 E+12.The doped layer of Cu2Se2 had lower ZTe values than pure BiCuSeO, however, indicating that these efforts to improve thermoelectric capabilities were ineffective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207