Synthesis of pyrrolo(pyrido)[1,2-a]quinazolinones and their benzoannulated analogues: An overview
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angular pyrrolo(pyrido)[1,2-a]quinazolinones, being structurally isomeric to linear pyrrolo(pyrido)[2,1-b]quinazolinone alkaloids, are attractive molecular systems for both synthetic transformations and targeted biomedical research. The pyrrolo(pyrido)[1,2-a]quinazolinone scaffold has proven to be quite effective in the search for compounds with a wide range of pharmacological activities, e.g. anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, antiarrhythmic, and inhibitors of important biotargets. The present review summarises the methods for the synthesis of pyrrolo(pyrido)[1,2-a]quinazolinones as a comprehensive research object, especially in the past decade. They are systematised according to the type of heteroannulation and include the processes of cascade annulation of the pyrimidine and pyrrole (pyridine) cycles to anthranilamides (hydrazides); formation of a pyrimidine nucleus based on ortho-pyrrolyl(pyridinyl) substituted aromatic compounds; annulation of the pyrrole (pyridine) nucleus to a quinazolinone scaffold. It is expected that the generalised material presented will serve as a reliable guide for the rational design of new pharmacologically oriented compounds
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".