MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410908542 · doi:10.1111/jpc.70094

Hospitalizations in Children With Optic Nerve Hypoplasia and Septo‐Optic‐Pituitary Dysplasia

2025· article· en· W4410908542 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael S. Salman, Chelsea Ruth, Marina Yogendran, Lisa M. Lix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaFoundation Fighting Blindness
KeywordsOptic nerve hypoplasiaMedicineHypopituitarismOptic nervePediatricsHypoplasiaRetrospective cohort studyPopulationDysplasiaOphthalmologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH) causes congenital impaired vision. The diagnosis of septo-optic-pituitary dysplasia (SOD) is made when ONH occurs in conjunction with hypopituitarism or absent septum pellucidum or abnormal corpus callosum. Our objectives were to describe differences in hospitalisation rates, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the primary reasons for hospitalisations among children with ONH/SOD in comparison to controls. METHODS: A population-based retrospective study with a case-control design was conducted. Cases were 124 ONH/SOD patients (mean age: 13 years, SD: 7.2 years), matched to 620 unrelated population-based controls (mean age: 12.4 years, SD: 7.2 years) on area of residence, year of birth, and sex. Non-parametric statistics were used to test for differences between cases and controls on number of hospital admissions, crude rates of admissions, and LOS. Relative rates (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Primary (most responsible) diagnoses were described for hospitalisations. RESULTS: ONH/SOD cases had the highest percentage of hospitalisations (26.6%-32.3%) in comparison to the control group (10.2%-12.6%), especially in the SOD subgroup with hypopituitarism (42.9%-54.3%) who were also at risk of multiple hospitalisations. ONH/SOD cases had a significantly higher crude hospitalisation rate in comparison to the control group (RR range:2.3-2.8, 95% CI range:1.6-4.2), and was highest in infants < 1-year-old and in the SOD subgroup with hypopituitarism. The median LOS was significantly higher in ONH/SOD cases in comparison to the controls [median (interquartile range):7-8 (3-21) versus 3-4 (2-9) days respectively, p ≤ 0.004]. Diseases of the respiratory system were the primary reasons for hospitalisation in all groups, but they were highest in the ONH/SOD group accounting for 25.3% of their hospitalisations versus 9.5% in the unrelated controls. CONCLUSION: Children with ONH/SOD have a higher rate of hospitalisation and LOS in comparison to controls, especially in the SOD subgroup with hypopituitarism. Diseases of the respiratory system were primarily responsible for hospitalisations in all groups, but disproportionately affected the ONH/SOD group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Paediatrics and Child HealthSame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207