MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410910871 · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115949

Implications of circular strategies on energy, water, and GHG emissions in informal housing in Lima

2025· article· en· W4410910871 on OpenAlexaff
Jaime Sarmiento-Pastor, Andrés Lira-Chirif, Daniel R. Rondinel-Oviedo, Naomi Keena, Anna Dyson, Marco Raugei, Alejandra Acevedo-De-los-Ríos

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Buildings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversidad de Lima
KeywordsGreenhouse gasEnergy (signal processing)Environmental scienceNatural resource economicsBusinessEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental planningEconomicsGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Informal homes evolve in 4 stages, increasing emissions as construction progresses. • Informal housing emits 450% more GHG per person than formal housing in Lima. • Selective deconstruction can cut carbon emissions by 81% versus landfilling. • Recycling cuts GHG emissions by 69% compared to landfilling in informal housing. • Selective deconstruction cuts water use by 82% and fossil energy by 80% vs. landfilling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and BuildingsSame topicUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFrench-language works237,207