Quantitative prediction of optical static refractive index in complex oxides
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The optical static refractive index, a critical intrinsic property of materials, plays a vital role in advanced optoelectronic applications. Accurate prediction of this index is essential for the efficient design and optimization of materials with tailored optical properties. Here, we present a robust predictive model that accurately forecasts the optical static refractive indices of complex oxides across diverse crystal structures and compositions. By leveraging chemical bond theory, our model elucidates the influence of intrinsic physical properties, including chemical bonds and d-electron bands, on the refractive index. Through rigorous analysis of 41 complex oxide systems and 5 doped systems, we demonstrate that our predictions align closely with experimental data, showcasing the model’s high accuracy and broad applicability. This work not only accelerates the development of novel materials and spectral design but also provides profound physical insights for optimizing and customizing optical properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it