Analysis of the Influence of Work Motivation and Work Environment on Employee Performance: Case Study at PT. Panja Multi Mineralindo
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of work motivation and work environment on employee performance at PT. Panja Multi Mineralindo, a company engaged in mining and natural stone crushing. This study uses a quantitative approach with a census method or saturated sample, involving the entire population of 77 employees. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with the help of SPSS software version 25. The results of the study indicate that there is a positive and significant influence between work motivation and employee performance, as well as a positive and significant influence between work environment and employee performance. In addition, work motivation and work environment simultaneously affect employee performance. The Adjusted R² value of 0.431 indicates that 43.1% of employee performance variation can be explained by work motivation and work environment, while the rest is influenced by other variables not studied. This study provides important implications for company management to increase motivation and create a conducive work environment in order to improve employee performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it