MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410923080 · doi:10.51601/ijse.v5i2.130

Urgency of Establishing a National Spices and Herbal Agency In Realizing Golden Indonesia 2045

2025· article· en· W4410923080 on OpenAlexaff
Yaya Sunaryo, Yudi Pratama, Riskal Arief, Asy’ari Muchtar, I S Harahap

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Traditional medicineBusinessPolitical scienceMedicineSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesia has a very large potential for "spices and herbs." Both are abundant as one of the natural resources bestowed by God Almighty. These resources have strategic value in the fields of health, medicine, industry, beauty and economy. However, their utilization has not been optimal in supporting sustainable national economic growth. Therefore, a national agency is needed that specifically manages spices and herbs to increase competitiveness, added value, and their contribution to the Indonesian economy. This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing the National Spice and Herbal Agency in order to support the vision of Indonesia Emas 2045. The method used is descriptive qualitative research with a case study approach, using secondary data from various relevant sources. The results of the study show that although Indonesia has abundant spice and herbal resources, their management is still sectoral and not yet integrated. Therefore, the establishment of a national agency that specifically handles this sector is a strategic step to create more effective, sustainable governance, and is able to increase the contribution of the spice and herbal sector to the national economy, including in Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) and exports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE)Same topicFood and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207